The Genius Act

Advanced Technology, Article, Blog, globalization, Public Policy, Uncategorized, , , , , , , ,

The U.S. Treasury is likely to need to borrow approximately $15 trillion over the next decade. As incredible as that seems, the U.S. Treasury cares about the price of that debt, and therefore, since they are the seller, they need to attract as many buyers as possible to keep the cost of that debt as low as possible. Basic supply and demand at work. Reliable treasury bond buyers are pulling back, primarily China and, to a certain degree, Japan. The Genius Act permits private entities to issue their own stablecoins, provided they are fully backed by U.S. treasuries. That will open up a new set of investors for the U.S. Treasury as it issues its required bonds. On the one hand, it’s an interesting solution because the Treasury can access an expanding market that exists outside the banking system. Expect to see much more international capital flows in US dollars, as well as significantly increased shadow banking among large US-based corporate entities that engage in business with each other and internationally.

Is AI Any Good?

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, Book Chapter, , , , , , ,

So far, we’ve attempted to answer that question through benchmarks. These give models a fixed set of questions to answer and grade them on how many they get right. But just like exams, these benchmarks don’t always reflect deeper abilities. Lately, it seems as if a new AI model is released every week, and each time a company introduces one, it comes with fresh scores showing it surpassing the capabilities of its predecessors. AI research is a hypercompetitive infinite game. An infinite game is open-ended—the goal is to keep playing. However, in AI, a dominant player often produces a significant result, triggering a wave of follow-up papers that chase the same narrow topic. This race-to-publish culture puts enormous pressure on researchers, rewarding speed over depth and short-term wins over long-term insight. If academia chooses to play a finite game, it will lose.

This “finite vs. infinite game” framework also applies to benchmarks. So, do we have a truly comprehensive scoreboard for evaluating the true quality of a model? Not really. Many dimensions—social, emotional, interdisciplinary—still evade assessment. But the wave of new benchmarks hints at a shift. As the field evolves, a bit of skepticism is probably healthy.

AI is Not Magic

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, Lectures, Transformative Businesses, , , , ,

Artificial intelligence is often imagined in extremes — utopian dreams of salvation or dystopian fears of extinction. More realistically, AI should be viewed as a normal technology. AI will be transformative, like electricity or the internet. Still, it will unfold over decades, shaped by human institutions, policies, and societal adoption patterns, not by sudden leaps into autonomous superintelligence. AI is not miraculous and unpredictable. It is transformative and will impact many lives for many decades. AI will not create extreme utopian or apocalyptic visions. It will be part of a continuum of human technological advances, powerful and transformative but ultimately shaped by human choices, institutions, and values.
Focusing on resilience, gradual adaptation, institutional innovation, and evidence-based governance can help society maximize AI’s benefits while managing its genuine risks. The future of AI will not be determined by the technology alone. We will determine it.

The US, China, and 3-D Chess

Article, China, Class Material, globalization, Lectures, Public Policy, , , , , , ,

The United States and China play global economic and political chess games. There are many moves and defensive and offensive strategies, not only for trade but also for energy and natural resources (rare earths among the most recent flavors of discord), geopolitics (Russia, Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East generally), technology (Taiwan and AI), and global economic supremacy. It’s a long list, but China and the US drive the outcomes. Instead of working for mutual benefit, regardless of fundamental cultural and political differences, we are now drawing bright lines demarking battle zones (Ukraine and Russia; Taiwan; AI and advanced technologies). The result will be economic and technical inefficiency and degradation in the quality of life, safety, and prosperity. China must acknowledge the outrage caused by its overreaching bids for control, and America must adjust to China’s presence without selling honor for profit. Competition is not us-or-them; reality is us-and-them. The U.S. semiconductor industry gets 30% of its revenue from China. China’s resulting products service the world, and China’s producers need the U.S. as well. If allowed, such examples of mutual benefit will proliferate.
It is naïve to imagine wrestling China back to the past. The project, now, is to contest its moral vision of the future. Connected, collaborative engagement is the only practical way. China has come a long way, and its trajectory cannot be ignored or dismissed. The U.S. and China will be much better off from this more enlightened, realistic perspective. See the whole board.

China, the US, and the “Trap”

Article, Book Chapter, China, Class Material, globalization, Investment Strategy, Lectures, Uncategorized, , , , , ,

The “Thucydides Trap” occurs when a rising nation-state—for the Greek historian Thucydides, it was Athens—must eventually have a violent confrontation with the existing dominant nation-state—Sparta in his time. It is a zero-sum game where there can be only one dominant nation-state as the eventual winner, and it is usually assumed that the rising nation-state will outdo the dominant nation-state resolved only by military conflict.The United States and China are today’s Sparta and Athens. For several decades, their geopolitical relationship has been fundamentally based on collaboration and healthy competition, raising the bar for both countries. Now, it is turning into discordant competition, trade restrictions, and embargoes. The combined benefits of global collaboration and competitiveness, not trade restraint, will only enhance the benefits for the United States and China. The government creates friction and potential conflict, which is the biggest reason we fall into the Thucydides Trap. If appropriate, oversight, sensible regulation, and enforceable trade agreements do not interfere with fair competition and collaboration. There is no “Trap” to avoid. The sooner China and the US realize this, the better off each country (and the world) will be.

China’s Emerging AI

Advanced Technology, Artificial Intelligence, China, Class Material, globalization, Lectures, Uncategorized, , , , , , ,

Significant VC activity and AI development opportunities are emerging in China. DeepSeek is the Vanguard of innovation from the artificial intelligence “moonshot” encouraged by the Chinese government. Not only will we see ongoing developments from Alibaba and Tencent, but there will also be a layer of elite AI companies at the forefront of China’s AI sector. US sanctions and restrictions have only increased innovation and groundbreaking AI development activity in China. Those sanctions will amount to nothing and encourage accelerated advancement.

The AI Wars

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, China, Transformative Businesses, , , , , , ,

The announcement of a $500 billion commitment to building AI infrastructure in the United States, is another major salvo in the AI wars. At this point, it’s hard to distinguish whether this is just hyperbole from hyperventilating technology executives or something with real substance.But, more importantly, it indicates an agenda to “win” in artificial intelligence. OpenAI, Softbank, and others are pushing the narrative to “beat China” and align themselves with the Trump administration. Fundamental is a belief that such a race exists, the US can gain advantage by dedicating computer resources, and it’s worth winning at all costs – whatever that means.Unfortunately, computer resources don’t define a sustainable advantage anymore. A decoupling of resources and cooperation between the United States and China have forced the Chinese to develop near-equivalent models while using only a fraction of resources. bigger data centers, substantial computing resources, and overwhelming numbers of GPU production won’t win this arms race. It’s A Zero-Sum Game That Amounts to Nothing.

AGI Is Not Coming Soon

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, Lectures, ,

This podcast discusses my article on the current state of artificial intelligence, focusing on the limitations of large language models and the unrealistic expectations surrounding the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). I argue that AI systems are not on a trajectory to match or exceed human intelligence because LLMs lack common sense and rely on regurgitating information rather than understanding. Despite the hype surrounding AGI, it is decades away, and the current focus on LLMs is misguided. Instead, I advocate for a different approach to AI that incorporates real-world interactions and visual data.

Burning Billions

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, Lectures, ,

Many experts are exaggerating artificial intelligence’s power and peril. Most public commentary, ranging from politicians to prominent technologists, says AI – more precisely, AGI – is close to surpassing human intelligence. The significant risk is that artificial intelligence will supplant human beings. This speculation even comes from Geoffrey Hinton, a Nobel prize-winning AI pioneer. AI models are useful, but, as Yann LeCun, Meta’s AI head, says, they are far from rivaling a house cat’s intelligence, let alone humans. The talk that AI will become so powerful that it poses an existential threat to human beings is nonsense. AI is a powerful tool and is becoming enormously important in all aspects of the economy. But AGI, malicious or otherwise, will not happen anytime soon.

Apple versus Visa

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, Class Material, Lectures, Transformative Businesses, , , , , , , ,

Apple can disrupt global finance. Visa and MasterCard are now vulnerable. Previously, it was believed that the capital required for infrastructure, systems, and processing was an insurmountable obstacle to any new competitor. But things have changed. Innovation and disruption in the credit card business pose a threat to established players like Visa and MasterCard. Apple can leverage its ecosystem, user experience focus, brand trust, strategic partnerships, and innovative use of data to succeed in the credit card business. Over time, as it scales and innovates, it could challenge Visa and MasterCard’s market dominance.