Navigating Uncertainty

Article, Book Chapter, China, Class Material, globalization, , , , , ,

A turbulent geopolitical and economic environment is here to stay. Allocating capital in today’s economic and geopolitical landscape requires a sharp focus on macro trends, a disciplined approach to risk, and an ability to anticipate shifts in policy and global power dynamics. The investment landscape has never been more complex, with heightened tensions between the U.S. and China, uncertainty surrounding Taiwan, and Europe’s economic fragility. The new reality is that trade realignments, subsidized industrial policies, and emerging trading blocs characterized by protectionism and localization are rising. Now What?Geopolitical risk is no longer an afterthought. The US-China rivalry, Taiwan’s strategic importance, Europe’s economic fragility, and shifting trade policies will shape the next decade of global markets. Savvy investors will anticipate these changes and allocate capital to industries and regions positioned for sustained growth. The key to success is flexibility, resilience, and the ability to recognize macro trends before they materialize fully. The future is uncertain but full of opportunities.

The US, China, and 3-D Chess

Article, China, Class Material, globalization, Lectures, Public Policy, , , , , , ,

The United States and China play global economic and political chess games. There are many moves and defensive and offensive strategies, not only for trade but also for energy and natural resources (rare earths among the most recent flavors of discord), geopolitics (Russia, Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East generally), technology (Taiwan and AI), and global economic supremacy. It’s a long list, but China and the US drive the outcomes. Instead of working for mutual benefit, regardless of fundamental cultural and political differences, we are now drawing bright lines demarking battle zones (Ukraine and Russia; Taiwan; AI and advanced technologies). The result will be economic and technical inefficiency and degradation in the quality of life, safety, and prosperity. China must acknowledge the outrage caused by its overreaching bids for control, and America must adjust to China’s presence without selling honor for profit. Competition is not us-or-them; reality is us-and-them. The U.S. semiconductor industry gets 30% of its revenue from China. China’s resulting products service the world, and China’s producers need the U.S. as well. If allowed, such examples of mutual benefit will proliferate.
It is naïve to imagine wrestling China back to the past. The project, now, is to contest its moral vision of the future. Connected, collaborative engagement is the only practical way. China has come a long way, and its trajectory cannot be ignored or dismissed. The U.S. and China will be much better off from this more enlightened, realistic perspective. See the whole board.

China, the US, and the “Trap”

Article, Book Chapter, China, Class Material, globalization, Investment Strategy, Lectures, Uncategorized, , , , , ,

The “Thucydides Trap” occurs when a rising nation-state—for the Greek historian Thucydides, it was Athens—must eventually have a violent confrontation with the existing dominant nation-state—Sparta in his time. It is a zero-sum game where there can be only one dominant nation-state as the eventual winner, and it is usually assumed that the rising nation-state will outdo the dominant nation-state resolved only by military conflict.The United States and China are today’s Sparta and Athens. For several decades, their geopolitical relationship has been fundamentally based on collaboration and healthy competition, raising the bar for both countries. Now, it is turning into discordant competition, trade restrictions, and embargoes. The combined benefits of global collaboration and competitiveness, not trade restraint, will only enhance the benefits for the United States and China. The government creates friction and potential conflict, which is the biggest reason we fall into the Thucydides Trap. If appropriate, oversight, sensible regulation, and enforceable trade agreements do not interfere with fair competition and collaboration. There is no “Trap” to avoid. The sooner China and the US realize this, the better off each country (and the world) will be.

The AI Wars

Advanced Technology, Article, Artificial Intelligence, China, Transformative Businesses, , , , , , ,

The announcement of a $500 billion commitment to building AI infrastructure in the United States, is another major salvo in the AI wars. At this point, it’s hard to distinguish whether this is just hyperbole from hyperventilating technology executives or something with real substance.But, more importantly, it indicates an agenda to “win” in artificial intelligence. OpenAI, Softbank, and others are pushing the narrative to “beat China” and align themselves with the Trump administration. Fundamental is a belief that such a race exists, the US can gain advantage by dedicating computer resources, and it’s worth winning at all costs – whatever that means.Unfortunately, computer resources don’t define a sustainable advantage anymore. A decoupling of resources and cooperation between the United States and China have forced the Chinese to develop near-equivalent models while using only a fraction of resources. bigger data centers, substantial computing resources, and overwhelming numbers of GPU production won’t win this arms race. It’s A Zero-Sum Game That Amounts to Nothing.

Industrial Policy – Stupidity by Another Name

Article, Book Chapter, Class Material, Investment Strategy, Lectures, Public Policy, , , , , ,

Zero-sum thinking has begun. Despite comparative advantage, mutual cooperation, and specialization proving indisputably more beneficial than any other approach to economic interaction, this ideal is under threat. Rules and norms for economic integration lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, created an order-of-magnitude increase in the average wealth of the Western population, and benefited countless hundreds of millions enabling a way of life otherwise unimaginable post-World War II. Now that system is under threat as developed countries subsidize alternative energy, attract manufacturing via expensive subsidies, and restrict the flow of goods and capital. Mutual benefit is out; national gain is now the highest priority. In other words, stupidity and zero-sum thinking have taken over. A handful of bureaucrats, regardless of how brilliant each may be, can never equal the mind of the market. Management and control usually spell disaster eventually. Managed focus on technological development for products and services the central government believes have greater substantial benefit to the overall society may not be calamitous, but the law of unintended consequences has not been repealed. It will be inefficient, substandard, and create potentially dangerous side effects. Innovation, creative freedom, and unstructured thought are essential components to the development of any technology of substance and disruptive benefit.

The Thucydides Trap

China, the US, and the Thucydides Trap

Book Chapter, Investment Strategy, Public Policy, , , , , , , ,

The “Thucydides trap” is where a rising nation-state – for Thucydides it was Athens – must eventually have a violent confrontation with the existing dominant nation-state – Sparta in his time. It is a zero-sum game where there can be only one dominant nation-state as the eventual winner – and it is usually assumed to be the rising nation-state outdoing the dominant nation-state.

Today, many “experts” (and I have great disdain for self-proclaimed experts) believe this is the circumstance between the US and China. We are headed toward violent confrontation where there can be only one winner. I read the book by Thucydides about the conflict between Athens and Sparta (I cannot be dispassionate here about that outcome because my family is from Sparta on my father’s side). But I fundamentally disagree with Thucydides’s historical descriptions being used as analysis by anyone to describe global events, especially those between the US and China.

Investment Principles

Stimulus and silliness

Book Chapter, Public Policy, , , , , , , , , ,

The world economy is struggling to escape the Covid-19 economic shock. During the worst of this pandemic, the world’s developed economies provided an enormous fiscal stimulus on a scale not seen since the second world war.

Now, however, the US is proposing to more than double its already generous fiscal stimulus. Is this a good idea or excessively risky?

Go Big, But Where?

For its proponents, the idea of “going big” is designed to be a transformative political moment. But too much appears allocated inefficiently, and it may simply be irresponsible.

An easy money era produced only anemic growth. But the scale and direction of additional stimulus look more like irresponsible fiscal policy leading to significant overheating and the waste of resources. While there is a strong case for a more aggressive approach to fiscal policy, that policy still needs to be grounded in economic realities and reasonable priorities. These are not.

A New Perspective

Article, , , , ,

Sometimes, things can change simply because we want things to change. People can feel differently and that can spark a cascade of cause and effect. For instance, sometimes a recession can start simply because people feel as if there is a recession. So, it becomes a downward spiral, and our actions start matching our thoughts and words, and suddenly we have caused recessionary activity. Then we enter a downward spiral that makes reality from our thoughts.

Some of the things that Pres. Biden has done right away were maneuvers to undo what seemed like harmful policies and actions. But also, it was intended to have us think differently. Right away, he did things to try to reconnect us with the rest of the world. For example, the United States is back in the Paris Accord, he is not going to build the wall, he is going to reconnect us with the WHO, and many other things. But right away, he is sending a message that the United States will become part of the world and that is likely to undo the fragmented and rudderless direction and create a cascade of positive actions that lead in the same direction – one toward openness and connectivity. I sense we are going to reconnect a little bit more with China, reconnect more generally with the world through global trade and cooperation on climate change, and many other important topics. It’s suddenly uplifting for people to focus their energy, and thoughts lead to words lead to actions.

Does the Music Stop in China?

Blog, , , , ,

Chinese economic policies and motivations since 2008 not only emphasize growth and sustainability of state-owned enterprises but, a critical but much less well-appreciated dimension is the Chinese government’s emphasis on stability. No economic policy in China will ignore this, and the high value placed on stability pervades all the current trade talks with the United…

Read More